عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسنده [English]چکیده [English]
In order to continue its life as well as expand its great discourse, Islamic Republic of Iran needs to reread political thought and method of its founder and rectify the its passed ways based on this very discourse. This paper has focused on Sazandegi state`s discourse. In spite of the fact that the sub-discourse of this state, like other states, had been the result of changes in the great discourse of Islamic Republic, one may claim its considerable differences with the political discourse of Imam Khomeini. This paper refers to main differences of these two discourses as: decreasing and setting up the otherness, challenging of pragmatism and technocracy, balanced development and development pattern, different viewpoints and tendency to such categories like efficiency and justice, development and justice, freedom and development, independency and development, and type of validity of some teachings like religion and social systems.